Is Curatorship Necessary for Web Communities to Thrive?

One of the most interesting lessons of Web2.0 is that even the most open communities need a form of hierarchical governance if they are to continue to serve their members well.

As as any web platform becomes very popular, so it becomes more enticing for people to game it to promote their own interests. If this is allowed to continue then the system can become cluttered and the ordinary user’s experience suffers. So, regrettably, it’s often necessary for someone to decide what is allowed and then kick out people who aren’t playing by the rules.

Here’s a talk by Jason Calcanis at Le Web which I think pretty much explains the importance of curatorship of web communities (with thanks to Charl for the link):

It is also important to clearly state the Terms of Use for any community site. We learned this lesson when Muti.co.za was criticized for the founder’s direct involvement in blocking certain users who were deemed to be spamming the system. Although I believe Neville’s actions helped keep the site useful to it’s users, not having public guidelines may have made it seem like a personal decision taken against certain users. Muti now has clear Terms of Use, and the community is flourishing.

6 Responses to “Is Curatorship Necessary for Web Communities to Thrive?”


  1. 1 Charl

    Fully, I agree 100%

    At Blueworld we often have the problem of users uploading porn – keeping advertisers happy with porn on the site is a issue.. – so we launched a “report this content” button so users can flag dodgey content (vids, photos etc), as soon as its flagged the content dissapears into a moderation Q untill we decide if its dodge or not.

  2. 2 Dave

    Thanks for the input Charl – yes, it’s a good idea to also allow other users to easily help you identify the trashers of the system.

  3. 3 robert

    Dave,

    Great post. Curatorship is a vital element to the growth and ongoing success of online communities.

    As Charl exemplifies, there are pitfalls and users/visitors who do not abide by the rules and demeen the entire venture. But while curatorship is important to gatekeep and moderate, the singlemost important element of adopting curators is the ‘who’ aspect.

    Who you invite to be a curator is so important. The curator needs to be so well aligned with your ambition for the community and be able to protect it while nuturing growth.

    RB

  1. 1 Suggestions For Muti | Mike Stopforth
  2. 2 20 Ways to Evaluate Contributions to a Corporate Social Network | Dave Duarte
  3. 3 Do you trust everything that appears in the blogosphere? « Media Update – The Blog

Leave a Reply






Close
E-mail It